and then all over my body; not right away but later on. First it was the face, hands and then feet.
(G.V.): (addresses therapist) Does this agree with your notes? Keep track of your notes so that you can remind her of what she said at that moment.
(Therapist): The headaches – the migraines – became better. Then she had more heart problems, palpitations; these became worse and she became very anxious about that.
(F.P.): Yes, but that was in October. And that’s important here because it was then that I found out that I have an intolerance to all cereals, bread, corn, etc.
LIVE
(G.V.): What she says is that two days after the remedy she had a strong reaction including severe headaches, vertigo, etc., and then her skin became worse. Notice that all of her complaints have remained the same except for her skin condition, which became worse. First mistake in reporting: she is not reporting objectively. Why? Because a remedy that produces a two-day aggravation – especially headaches – and aggravates the skin cannot be a bad remedy. Therefore, according to homeopathic law, we would say that the organism is trying to rearrange things. The organism is now moving in the right direction, and is in the process of sorting out the important problems from the unimportant ones in an attempt to find a balance. This is shown through the stomach and the eruptions. There is a fight going on inside her involving her psychological state, and for the duration of this fight all her problems must be taken into consideration and rearranged. What kind of a rearrangement is this? She says that her skin is worse and everything else is the same. I hear her speak of a two-day aggravation. I find out that her skin is worse. Nevertheless, I still say that her internal state must be better. She may need another remedy because she is still suffering from