but I don’t want to confront it, because I don’t think that’s the appropriate thing for me to do. It is not within the possibilities I have as a homeopath. Besides, I stayed in Berkeley only a short time; I went away after a month or so.
What I am trying to show are the possibilities that arise with the correct remedy, that is all. My function is to show, on a broader scale, what potentials for treatment are attainable using home-opathy. I’m standing here not because I am more clever or more knowledgeable than you, but because I have more experience. I have been involved with homeopathy for almost thirty years, practically my entire life has been dedicated to homeopathy; thirty years from sunrise to sunset. I am sure you can act also as advisors, as psychologists, psychoanalysts, and that you may have the chance to help your patients develop by talking to them, and by using your skills and your spiritual evolution. I feel that a person is not in the position to help anybody else unless they themselves are on a higher spiritual level. I don’t mean “spir-itual” in the religious sense, I mean real internal ethical matters: the understanding of what the truth is, a consciousness that is quite high. The very fact that you are there and on a spiritually higher plain enables you to perceive what is happening and to help by advising. But if your consciousness is lower than the patient’s, you will usually not be able to advise further. But with homeopathy you can really do miracles. I don’t feel that I did anything in the case to help her progress, to make her more mature, everything was done by the remedy, although I know that some of you don’t believe it.