four days, perhaps five weeks, and then they’ve cried enough. You can’t go on and on grieving forever, even if you lose your mother, your father, your child, or whomever. Life is life, it has to predominate over death. If death predominates it is a patho-logical state. I don’t really know what is going to happen to the child or how he is going to face the challenges of the future. What I believe is that he will be able to face these challenges, whatever they are, much more easily now after the remedy.
(A): Why did you give a 200 potency ?
(G.V.): It was a precarious state in this case, perhaps you didn’t realize it because I did not let the video run all the way through. The child was unable to eat anything at all, he was exhausted and dehydrated. How long could he have gone on like that? In the event that the remedy is not the right one, it may aggravate, especially when it is close to the correct remedy, but I don’t know what sort of aggravation this might be.
(A): Did uou explain the grief of the child to the paremts? (G.V.): We had some discussions after this was finished, and I asked the mother whether she now understands why the child was like this. She said, “yes.” But that is all we discussed later on. It is very strange, the woman seemed to have understood on one level what was happening, but on another level she could not do anything else. During this case I also had some other thoughts about what might have happened that lead to the situ-ation. I never expressed it to anyone, nor pursued it in the case taking, as that was not really important. I had already gotten the confirmation for the Ignatia..and there was no need to go further into their personal lives.