pains and the tight cough. I talked to her this morning and then again at 3:00 p.m., just to see if she was still relapsing, and she was actually weepy on the phone at that point. Everything else was pretty much the same: her thirst; still being much worse lying down; cough worse talking, moving.
(G.V.): So you repeated the remedy?
(Therapist): So we gave IM, 10M, 50M of Pulsatilla. What do you think is going to happen?
(G.V.): Well, as I said from the beginning, this is a case in which you don’t really know whether or not you are going to need antibiotics quite soon.
LIVE
(A1): I think you gave 200, 1M, and 10M on the first day, and then 1M, 10M, and 50M on the second day.
(G.V.): Right.
(A2.): How long afterwards was the follow-up?
(G.V.): 3:00 p.m. of the next day, about twenty hours later. The repetition of the dose was a little bit higher – 1M, 10M, 50M – than it was on the first day – 200, 1M, 10M. Still, it is not clear whether or not the same remedy continues; it might have changed. I’m stressing this point because you shouldn’t assume automatically that once the remedy has acted it is going to act again. Especially in such severe cases the symptomatology might change, although the practitioner might say that every-thing seems pretty much the same as before. This may not be true, it might be a statement of something else that cannot yet easily be discerned. Maybe we will be lucky enough here and what she experiences is really a relapse. What you would like to see immediately in this case is an amelioration of the main symptom endangering the life of the patient. You do not go into such severe cases with the attitude, “Oh! that is a good aggrava-tion, she was coughing five hours a day and now she is coughing all night!” – No! because if the coughing is life-threatening –preventing her from being able to sleep, rest – then it has to be