called acute symptoms develop, should we wait or intervene? Can we intervene without disturbing the process?”
G.V.: “This is a very complicated question, and the answer is equally complex. You see, it depends. You are treating someone chronically, who in the process of treatment develops an acute. Are you going to treat this acute? The answer is not simple. Sometimes you must treat, sometimes you must not! What does it depend on? On many factors. These we cannot discuss in this moment. This is what I said. When you take the video-course, you will receive all this information.
You will understand what I mean. You will understand that we don’t all belong to the same level of health. We appear to be, but there are different levels of health for each one of us. Now, it depends on which level of health a patient is, in order to decide whether you will treat the acute or not. From this level of health it even depends if you will develop an acute at all or not.
You see, just as a general idea: once you enter into a deep, chronic condition, you stop getting acutes. If you had acutes happening in the past – “Five years ago I was getting an acute every second day/every month/every second week” – and this stopped five years ago: are you better off or worse? The most probable answer is that you are much worse. You have entered a state, a chronic condition, which does not allow the development of the acute condition.
If you treat such cases, and then they develop acutes again, that is beautiful!