people simply is not worthwhile, not worth the effort. Some patients may experience a sense of alienation. They feel that no real outlet exists for their emotions, that no other person could truly understand the strong feelings they have inside. Consequently, in the interview they may say something such as, “1 am different from other people.”
Thus, the Aethusa person becomes a loner. It is not a matter of his being unable to communicate; in fact, during the interview he may be quite communicative. He is neither insecure with others nor fearful of their reaction to him; rather he appears to have adopted a fundamental conviction that communication with other human beings is practically impossible on a deeper level.
Aethusa should not be confused with certain other closed personality types, such as Ignatia and Natrum muriaticum. These latter types are highly refined, oversensitive, almost hysterical people in whom hurts and griefs produce a type of emotional cramping or hardening. The Aethusa type is not hypersensitive, not so refined, not hysterical. He has intense feelings which are more robust, more primal — like a child’s emotions. The emotions are too vital to become cramped in Aethusa; embitterment is unlikely, and the fragile, hysterical elements of Ignatia and Natrum muriaticum are not found in this remedy.
Such intense emotions, however, must find expression, and the Aethusa person seems drawn to one singular outlet: animals. This person who does not want to communicate with other human beings may have extraordinary communication with animals. He may develop an exaggerated attachment to animals and communicate all his pent-up emotions to his pets. From our earlier comparison of the primal emotions of Aethusa to those of a child we can understand this love for animals by recalling the love certain children develop for a pet. The Aethusa person may love animals more than he loves any human being. The patient actually may say, “I am not interested in the love of human beings, only the love of animals.” He converses with animals as if they were human, and he derives great emotional satisfaction from this communication. In some cases he may even collect dozens of animals; he becomes an animal protector. If someone were to throw a rock at one of his pets, he could become livid and literally have the urge to kill the offender. The attachment can be so extreme that the patient may even consider bequeathing his estate to his animals.
It is interesting that in the provings as well in Kent’s Repertory Aethusa is mentioned in the rubric “delusions of animals.” Some patients may