was filmed, and asked, “what is the remedy?” – everything else except of Baryta carbonica was suggested. Because the moment that you take a case you do exactly the same thing- just ask question after question and you write down answer after answer. You are no longer in the position to judge what is important and what isn’t. Finally you have a heap of information, all taken from the written report of the case, which has been presented confusingly: There are symptoms of Gelsemium, of Natrum murlaticum, of Mercury, of Phosphorus, or of Lycopodium. . all the remedies are there. But when you see the case, you know that in the materia medica there is only one correct remedy for her and that is Baryta carbonica. When I entered the class after taking this case, it is not easy for the students to find the remedy, it is only the knowledge that makes it easy. If you have this knowledge, you’ll perceive the remedy immediately. So, let’s see a little bit more confusion:
VIDEO
(F.P.): When I’m cold, I am cold and I want to be in the blanket, or I want to be warm; and when I am hot, I want to uncover myself.
LIVE
(G.V.): This is Mercury; Mercury will answer my question in this way. She salivates during sleep and I know that Baryta car-bonica salivates during sleep. I asked her if she salivates and I expected her to say yes. That is the way you are misled, because you stop here and don’t go to the essence of things.
when I talk about “essence” and what the “essence of a remedy” is, this is what 1 mean. Don’t go to little details and forget about the essence that is there. Let’s see a little bit more.
VIDEO
(F.P.): (Sighs)