Books

The Bern Seminars – Page 7

Constitutional prescribing

When we begin practicing homeopathy, we know the basic law: “SIMILIA SIMILIBUS CURENTUR”. We then become very enthusiastic, dispense remedies, and experience what we call in homeopathy, “homeopathic surprises”: Often you don’t expect anything to happen and suddenly you see a beautiful cure taking place, while other times you are very sure about the remedy and nothing happens. When you give a remedy, something either happens or it doesn’t, in which case you give another remedy. You may continue dispensing remedies in the hope of calling forth some effect, and as the years go by you look back at your cases and ask yourself: Wait a moment, what am I doing? Have I been following a logical hypothesis without being aware of it? Why did one patient get well? Why did another patient not do well, in spite of the fact that he appeared to respond well to some of the remedies given? These were the kinds of questions I asked myself during the early stages of my homeopathic studies. By way of these questions I began to observe what was taking place. As you know, with classical homeopathic theories one remedy is administered at a time. We can look at a case in primarily one of two ways: One way, or one theory, is that we can peel the case like an onion, going through the different layers of an individual state. The other theory says that we have to find that one remedy which runs right through the patient’s history because that remedy is the real similimum and will do the trick. As I look back on my experi-