According to my understanding, this case is quite typical of Helleborus, corresponding to the earlier stages of the remedy’s pathogenesis. The sluggishness is very characteristic. Here we see a person who experiences great difficulty in receiving stimuli, such as questions, and in attempting to respond to them. The Helleborus patient pauses a long while, and finally answers hesitantly. “I think so,” is frequently his best attempt at an answer. In the Repertory we find Helleborus in the rubric, ‘Answers: reflects long. ’
We should note the type of headache described in this case; a stupefying headache. Stupefaction and sluggishness characterise this case. In our materia medica one cannot find descriptions of all the various cases one will see, but the general ideas of the remedy descriptions provide hints that can be applied to those cases.
In Helleborus the essential theme to be remembered is stupefaction, and difficulty in communication. There is of course a great differ¬ence between this early stage of the Helleborus pathology, and the more florid and characteristic end stages, with stupor, convulsions, rolling the head in agony, and inflammation of the brain or meninges (we shall describe these stages later on).
Helleborus seems to interrupt communication in its most general sense. It seems to stupefy that portion of the brain that receives, processes, and interprets sensory data from the outside world. There is a creeping slowness in that process. The Helleborus individual puzzles, “What did I hear? What’s going on?”. It is only after time has elapsed that an understanding of what is occurring is achieved.
The reverse process, that of expression, is also compromised. Hahnemann has written in his provings of Helleborus: A condition where with sight unimpaired, nothing is seen very fully.’ They see, and yet they do not see fully. The eyes are normal, their functioning unimpaired. They see objects, but the nervous impulses generated by the forms do not penetrate to that part of the brain where the image