should not take the symptom literally and look for twitchings. In this case for instance it must be understood as some nervous action on one side while the other is motionless or semi-paralysed.
5. I was called in consultation to see Miss M. who was thought to be near dying. I found the patient in great distress, panting respiration, unable to speak, only in a whisper, and each word uttered separately from the next by several respirations. She had great pain shooting all through her chest from front to back. She had informed me she could not long survive, as each breath seemed as if it would be her last one. She had no thirst, scanty urine, and had not slept for two days. Percussion over her chest gave a clear and healthy sound. Auscultation revealed permeability of air through her lungs but a very loud bronchial rale.
No other remedy has this combination of symptoms excepting Apis. My choice fell on the 40m potency for the reason that she was too ill to bear a lower potency of a large dose of the material. Directions were given to repeat the Apis 40m in water every hour till she seemed a little better, then to cease giving entirely till we saw her in the morning.
After the third dose she became quiet, fell asleep for two hours and remained quiet the whole night, sleeping at intervals till morning. Contrary to instructions, the remedy was repeated every time she awoke, till 9 in the morning, when she received the last dose remaining, soon after which she became as bad as on the previous evening. We saw her at 10.30 a.m. and found her about the same as on my first visit. Now what was to be done. The same remedy was still indicated, and it was very evident that she had been overdosed, therefore sac-lac. was given during the day and when we saw her at 6.30 p.m. she was again more comfortable. Sac-lac. was given till 10.30 the next morning, when we found her still more comfotable. Next day still better, and still Sac lac. So day after day showed that, on the whole, she was improving and she made a perfect recovery without a further dose of medicine. Dr.H.N.Guersney.
Observation:
a. In this case the attending physician himself designates the symptoms on which he prescribed the remedy. The most interesting point is the description of the "presentiment of death" in this lady where she feels that "every breath will be the last" and the expression: " she informed me that she could not long survive". This is a unique feature with this remedy as it is neither "fear of death" nor "predicting the time of death," it is rather a feeling that the "soul will come out with the breath."
b. Overdosing the patient can bring about a relapse. In this case what Dr.Guersney did was correct, ie waiting to see the evolution. But not all cases will do better spontaneously. Had the following 24 hours brought about an aggravation instead of an amelioration, a higher potency would have accomplished the cure. The fact that the case reacts to an already high potency without much aggravation shows that we are allowed to go higher without danger.
c. Another interesting observation is that the doctor says that the case was too ill to bear a large dose of medicine. Yet the B.H. case was much more severe and Apis 2
acted well. Where is the truth?